.
owed it to myself, (do not know if the readers too), a small review of what it means, it looks across for me.
conceived this blog as a small toolbox. For a break from my writing "serious" I mean he did not intend to make a simple statement of my writing but to use the act of writing and exposing the writing to think.
important thing in this blog is the process of writing and thinking, and not (much) the outcome of this process.
I take the license, then, almost immediately publish what I write, uncorrected. And I corrected as I read and I read from the outside. I want to break this writer's fear of not being consistent and correct.
Perhaps, I think now, would have been better not write this. Do not break the magic of the event and want to restore consistency, a new level of what has been said and published under my name. Not wanting to restore the unity, or at least the dialectic of two opposites (my self and my desire) as opposed to the multiple scattering of my texts.
But I console myself that this task would have been equally doomed. That the image of myself, my name, the power of words to designate a coherence time ago that my sense of novelty choking. That, finally, the failure of that other work just to ensure the success of think that. That is, just think.
And there wanted to meet (because, and here I am not mistaken, still looking for something from me), looking from the outside, looking across at me and be sucked indefinitely by the otherness that is no return or final point of arrival but an infinite bounce function.
that chance to let the theater again and perversion produce the trance, the trance of thinking, ie thinking that.
the other side.
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment