psychonautical: marijuana withdrawal
.
marijuana withdrawal
Experience 1: Abstinence intermittently for 6 months.
About 1 year ago I started to experiement defined and systematic withdrawal of marijuana. I should add, without enlarging on this point, that these exercises were an asceticism, ie practices to cause certain changes in myself, particularly regarding the effects of marijuana on my conscience. As consumer
marijuana daily (about 1 gram per day of good maria without snuff or hashish) for about 15 years, the more effectively to change my relationship with marijuana was consuming less, consuming a greater amount decreased the quality of buzz, a "loss of brightness" of the experience.
thus began to space consumption. The first two months, at intervals of 1 and two days, and then a couple of months within 1 week for 3 months. The last 2 months consumed every 12 or 15 days, reaching a maximum period of 17 days without smoking.
The conclusion of those 6 months was that the buzz was much more pleasant and milder side effects in direct relation to the time of withdrawal. I did not feel another "withdrawal symptoms" that a slight difficulty deep sleep the first 5 or 6 days of not smoking. The biggest change
level effects smoking when I was in the first 3 to 7 days: smoking at 7 or 17 days did not have much difference.
Experience 2: complete abstinence 6 months 15 days.
After this exercise was formed in my head the idea of \u200b\u200bmaking a complete withdrawal experience.
There were two circumstances that influenced my idea: the first was a meeting that my girlfriend suggested that I try to leave the marijuana because she had done and according to his opinion that had given him many advantages (higher concentration, activity and self-perception) : not really say too credit to your opinion, but I found myself rejecting the idea that it was not really able to abstain and decided to meet that exerted.
The second fact was that was to move to Spain and would not travel over any illegal drugs. I then exploit the situation and make an experience of 3 months of abstinence, which ultimately were 6 months and 15 days.
The first week was similar to last time: a little deeper trouble sleeping the first few days, but nothing more.
I must confess that I counted the days to 2 months (which was the minimum that I had raised) but since they are 3 months only I remembered my withdrawal period when round dates were met. I was opportunity to smoke several times but I felt like.
The most obvious effects were to be a little more awake (especially in the morning) and active. Nothing at the memory.
When the 6 months back to Spain where I met a vase with maria made by me and a good friend, excellent grower, with whom smoked after 6 months of abstinence.
Experience 3: Effect of maria after 6 months.
camindando We smoked with my friend in a park at night. Maria suffused made by him (Queen Mother, mostly sativa)
I took two puffs, normal, not very deep, and waited. Not sure what to expect: if a drop in tension with supercolocon as as a teenager or something more normal.
Neither one nor the other, not so huge but very far from a normal buzz.
The first sensation that lasted nearly 1 hour was that of being in a bubble, my head basically. My feet were a mobility tools on which he had no voluntary control in the absence of a special intention.
The second sensation was an expanded capacity to perceive numerous mutitude, ideas and thoughts at the same time. Contemplating thoughts with a sense of spatiality, see distributed in consciousness. Good imagination and a very creative and analytical thinking.
The third set was feeling a glow of color experience and had not received from my earliest years of experience with Mary. I could have laughed too but I avoided it for greater insight.
The buzz last long at its high point, approximately 2 hours.
After this first experience I went back to smoking after 2 days and then smoked over 2 days straight. These early effects were repeated albeit declining. Conclusions
.
From these experiences I gained a new way of tackling an experience of marijuana. At the moment I prefer to take it as a psychedelic drug, not a social drug.
also conclude that the main subject of daily use is the loss of experience. There is also effect calm, soothing or "demotivational" with daily use, but even if you smoke before going to sleep. But these effects are not significant or alarming.
There are no true "withdrawal symptoms" of marijuana, marijuana addiction is an addiction exists but a habit like any other. The drug element is very slight.
If anyone cares to try.
1 - withdrawal effects on stoned, with abstinence of 3 days are evident and reach their peak at 15 or 17 days. Since there are increasing but very slowly. The buzz after abstinence of 1 month was as strong as with a 6 months.
2
withdrawal effects on the "normal ." The most obvious effects are manifested in the first week and then do little visible up to 3 months where peak experiences. From 3 months to 6 months notice no obvious change in my nigun been traced back to the boiler.
psychonautical
What is a drug, which is to be placed? What is psychonautical? Join me
the non-philosophical thought.
simplest thought is to be placed is to take a drug that affects mood. But (according to J. Ott) we see that "our performance modifying substances organic" are all elements that we consume (food, even water, even oxygen). Then, if our organic operation is a continuous change, then: it is a drug? which is a distinct change from normal?
I will not deny that there are drugs, normal states and changes, but point out that we must build. Of course, socially, through representations (drug is marijuana and not coffee, etc), but also individually with practices of self: what we do to ourselves. From that perspective
define normal from a mathematical sense and perspective, continuity constantly built and rebuilt; Drugs is a change, an alteration of the pattern; psychonautical would change our consciousness or, if you will, explore the constant change that our conscience is.
conepto If we keep the drug as something that changes clearly not forget that the drug is not an object but a function of alteration. From a practical perspective, this means that for a regular user of marijuana, the practice of abstinence may be more drug THC. It was for me without doubt Nigun. When the THC
became part of my normal state (through 15 years smoking) lost some of its effectiveness as a drug. After this experience, when I stop being part of my normal, the effect of substantially recovered drug effectiveness.
.
Monday, February 22, 2010
Friday, February 12, 2010
Will Orange Juice Produce More Phelgm
The place of Copyright
.
What is the place of art? Where? Where we look when we need something that moves us when we need to renew our awareness beauty?
Some think that the place of art is a museum, a major gallery where the recognition of critics say that these works are true art. Art with a capital of seriousness.
Others will say that the place of art is on the street, in parks, in the occupied spaces which ensures the truth of art is its authenticity, independence, originality.
latter is perhaps more successful but still remains linking art with its execution space. And that space, for us, no big deal.
Wolves Little Hans say that the place of art does not exist, that art is defined by constantly out where we want to put it, to where we want to ensure its permanence, its existence as a possession of aesthetic value, political or moral .
marketing is to give more to the art (movistar space "). Removing constant flow aesthetic artists and projects in a product, integrating art into the production-consumption. Fashion, in contrast, tries to bring the circuit of production and consumption closer to art: to impregnate the sale and removal gain of artistic beauty.
But art is not left, it is extremely unruly.
art has no place for art. Although states, municipalities and social work of banks ("Obra Social de La Caixa") fund it and give it space art should give up being positioned to continue to exist as art.
The place of art is its own dimension, out of any location, any presence assured and relaxed.
Art needs to be nomadic, wandering fugitive. Even otherwise, protesting or opposing. The place of art is not confrontation or clash. Art can not be exhausted in a ANTI-not anti-establishment or anti-fascist, or anti-capitalist or anti-logical. The place of art is a FOR TRANS-to-normal, para-system, para-logical, for-thought: a trans-space. Leaving
cyclically and reconnect itself, where no one had ever expected, lack of fixed location, mutate and become something else is an inevitable task of artistic creation.
So what interests us most is finding a place for art in the social system but to bring this system to the trans-location of art. There
the place of art is indestructible, can not leave it to play its foundation has to enter his land. Land
absolutely impervious to the war machine.
Wolves Little Hans
Originally published in Revista Ta Kin. solar Shit "
.
.
What is the place of art? Where? Where we look when we need something that moves us when we need to renew our awareness beauty?
Some think that the place of art is a museum, a major gallery where the recognition of critics say that these works are true art. Art with a capital of seriousness.
Others will say that the place of art is on the street, in parks, in the occupied spaces which ensures the truth of art is its authenticity, independence, originality.
latter is perhaps more successful but still remains linking art with its execution space. And that space, for us, no big deal.
Wolves Little Hans say that the place of art does not exist, that art is defined by constantly out where we want to put it, to where we want to ensure its permanence, its existence as a possession of aesthetic value, political or moral .
marketing is to give more to the art (movistar space "). Removing constant flow aesthetic artists and projects in a product, integrating art into the production-consumption. Fashion, in contrast, tries to bring the circuit of production and consumption closer to art: to impregnate the sale and removal gain of artistic beauty.
But art is not left, it is extremely unruly.
art has no place for art. Although states, municipalities and social work of banks ("Obra Social de La Caixa") fund it and give it space art should give up being positioned to continue to exist as art.
The place of art is its own dimension, out of any location, any presence assured and relaxed.
Art needs to be nomadic, wandering fugitive. Even otherwise, protesting or opposing. The place of art is not confrontation or clash. Art can not be exhausted in a ANTI-not anti-establishment or anti-fascist, or anti-capitalist or anti-logical. The place of art is a FOR TRANS-to-normal, para-system, para-logical, for-thought: a trans-space. Leaving
cyclically and reconnect itself, where no one had ever expected, lack of fixed location, mutate and become something else is an inevitable task of artistic creation.
So what interests us most is finding a place for art in the social system but to bring this system to the trans-location of art. There
the place of art is indestructible, can not leave it to play its foundation has to enter his land. Land
absolutely impervious to the war machine.
Wolves Little Hans
Originally published in Revista Ta Kin. solar Shit "
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)